I'm a theologian.  I approach the world through a fairly unusual way.  When I come across a theory about the world, I question it as a theologian meaning I try to keep God in mind when I analyze it. 
So I saw this commercial on television.  It turned out to be a gum commercial.  It touted that this gum kept it's taste longer than other gums, by using a tongue-in-cheek approach.  During the commercial, the gum is first eaten by a one-cell creature, which evolves into a fish, which evolves into a lizard, which evolves into another creature, which evolves into an ape, which finally evolves into a human.  The gum was being chewed all the way.  Obviously the underlying premise is the theory of evolution.
This commerical makes me wonder: In 2.6 million years since the first appearance of hominina there has been about six or seven "evolutionary jumps".  There has been only a couple movements from apes to humans  and all of those happened some two million years ago.  Why?  Why wouldn't more evolutionary jumps happen?  If evolution is a natural occurance, then wouldn't it happen all the time?  Wouldn't there be more bipeds descending?  Wouldn't we discover that even today apes were becoming homininas? 
As a theologian, I believe in abundance of God's creation, not scarcity - the Bible teaches that.  Thus if the theory of evolution is true and valid, which I see no reason why it isn't, then why would evolutionary jumps be so scarce, rare and distant? 
It's just been on my mind?
Thursday, March 5, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment